Get the BEST Montgomery
Criminal Attorney
on Your Side
Anyone charged with drug possession across state lines in Montgomery County, Texas is an extremely serious legal situation that can carry long term consequences. Commonly, these cases involve alleged possession of controlled substances that occurred while crossing Texas state borders. These cases often touch on both state and federal jurisdiction, and prosecutors in Montgomery County treat these allegations with maximum intensity. A conviction can lead to years in prison, steep fines, long-term supervision, loss of civil rights, and ripple effects that impact employment, family life, and financial stability.
If you or someone you love has been charged with drug possession across state lines in Montgomery County, Texas it’s important to understand both the gravity of the situation and the value of experienced legal representation. Early legal intervention often makes the difference between a devastating conviction and the best possible outcome under difficult circumstances.
For more than 25 years, Montgomery defense attorney Andrea Kolski has successfully defended clients throughout Texas against serious drug offenses, including complex interstate drug allegations. Her extensive courtroom experience, deep understanding of drug laws, and strategic approach to defense allow her to protect her clients’ rights and futures with skill and determination. You can learn more about her and her approach on Andrea Kolski’s bio page.
Drug possession across state lines refers to allegations that an individual knowingly transported or possessed controlled substances while crossing state borders, or that the possession of drugs was somehow connected with interstate activity. These cases often draw scrutiny from multiple law enforcement agencies, including local police, county sheriffs, and federal authorities such as the Drug Enforcement Administration.
In Texas, most drug possession cases are prosecuted under the Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 481, also known as the Texas Controlled Substances Act. Possession of a controlled substance is defined under Texas Health and Safety Code § 481.115 and § 481.116 depending on the specific substance involved. Under Texas law, it is unlawful to knowingly or intentionally possess a controlled substance unless the drug was obtained through a valid prescription or legal authority.
While Texas statutes do not contain a specific standalone definition for “drug possession across state lines,” prosecutors often use evidence of interstate travel or crossing state lines to support allegations of enhanced charges, intent to distribute, or coordination with illegal drug transportation networks. In some cases, federal statutes such as 21 United States Code § 841 (which governs federal drug possession and distribution offenses) may also be invoked, leading to potential federal prosecution.
The interplay between Texas drug possession laws, interstate elements, and potential federal involvement makes these cases especially complex. A knowledgeable defense attorney must be prepared to address jurisdictional issues, conflicting statutes, and strategic defenses tailored to multi-jurisdictional facts.
With many states legalizing marijuana or other drugs, bringing those drugs back to Texas intentionally or by mistake can risk serious legal trouble. Drug possession across state lines cases often arise from traffic stops on major highways that cross state borders, such as Interstate 45, Interstate 10, or US 59. Law enforcement officers may allege that they smelled drugs, observed suspicious behavior, or found paraphernalia or substances during a search of a vehicle.
In other cases, charges result from multi-agency investigations involving county, state, and federal law enforcement. These investigations may use confidential informants, surveillance, controlled buys, or tips that escalate into searches and arrests.
International travel returning through Texas checkpoints or airports can also lead to interstate possession allegations if drugs are found in luggage or on a person. Regardless of how the case begins, allegations that involve crossing state lines raise the stakes significantly.
Drug possession offenses in Texas depend on the type and quantity of the controlled substance involved. Texas Health and Safety Code § 481.115 defines the unlawful possession of Penalty Group 1 substances such as cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine, and fentanyl. Penalty Groups 2 through 4 cover other controlled substances.
Possession charges are categorized by weight, which directly affects the severity of the offense:
These statutory penalties are outlined in state law and applied based on alleged facts. The presence of interstate travel can be used by prosecutors to support higher charges, argue for intent to distribute, or assert involvement in broader criminal activity, although Texas law does not automatically elevate possession charges simply because interstate travel occurred.
When federal statutes come into play, the possible punishments can increase significantly. Under 21 United States Code § 841, possession with intent to distribute controlled substances across state lines is a federal offense that can carry lengthy prison terms, high fines, and supervised release. Federal prosecutors have broader sentencing ranges and limited opportunities for probation compared to state court.
Montgomery County is known for aggressively pursuing drug cases including drug possession across state lines. Penalties in Montgomery County vary widely based on the substance and quantity involved. Even at the lowest level, a state jail felony conviction for possession of a controlled substance carries potential incarceration and long-term consequences.
In Texas, a state jail felony is punishable by 180 days to two years in a state jail facility and up to a $10,000 fine. More serious felony levels carry stiffer penalties. A second degree felony may result in two to twenty years in prison and fines up to $10,000, while first degree felonies can lead to five to ninety nine years or life in prison.
Federal cases, which may be triggered by clear evidence of possession across state lines with intent to distribute, can carry mandatory minimum sentences, especially when higher quantities or aggravating factors are alleged. For example, possession with intent to distribute large quantities of controlled substances can result in double digit prison terms under federal law.
In addition to incarceration, a conviction can result in probation, supervised release, mandatory drug counseling, community service, and a permanent criminal record. These penalties do not account for the collateral effects that follow a conviction long after the sentence ends.
A drug possession across state lines conviction can have serious and lasting impacts on every aspect of a person’s life:
Employment opportunities frequently diminish with a felony conviction. Many employers conduct background checks and may be unwilling to hire someone with a serious drug offense on their record. Professional licenses can be jeopardized or revoked, affecting careers in healthcare, law, education, transportation, and other regulated fields.
Family life may suffer as individuals navigate legal deadlines, possible incarceration, and the stress that a prolonged criminal case imposes on relationships and children. Custody and visitation disputes may become more contentious, and parenting roles may be constrained by legal restrictions.
Financial stability often deteriorates due to legal fees, fines, lost wages from time in detention, and the long-term reduction of income potential after conviction. Housing applications may be rejected due to criminal records, and educational opportunities can be limited because of eligibility restrictions for financial aid or school admission.
Emotionally and psychologically, the stigma of a conviction can impact self-esteem and mental health. The strain of a criminal case and the uncertainty of possible punishment can disrupt daily life, relationships, and long-term goals.
Because drug possession across state lines cases often involve complex facts and intersecting laws, defense strategies must be tailored to the specifics of each situation. Effective defenses may focus on jurisdictional challenges, the legality of law enforcement conduct, and whether the State or federal government can meet its burden of proof.
Challenging the legality of a traffic stop or search is one of the most common and powerful defenses. If law enforcement lacked reasonable suspicion or probable cause, evidence discovered during an illegal search may be suppressed or excluded entirely.
Another defense may involve disputing whether the accused knowingly possessed the drugs. Possession requires proof of knowledge and control. When drugs are found in shared spaces or in a vehicle occupied by multiple people, the State must prove that the defendant had knowledge of and control over the substances.
Because interstate allegations often draw on complex investigative techniques, a detailed review of how evidence was collected, stored, and analyzed is critical. Chain of custody issues and laboratory errors may undermine the State’s case.
In federal cases, addressing allegations related to intent to distribute versus simple possession can be critical. Downward departures and mitigation strategies may be available depending on individual circumstances.
Drug possession across state lines charges carry serious penalties and require immediate, strategic legal action. The early stages of a case are crucial. A seasoned defense attorney can assess the State’s evidence, identify constitutional violations, and position the case for dismissal, reduction, or the most advantageous resolution possible.
Prosecutors often wield assumptions that go unchallenged when defendants attempt to represent themselves. Without experience in drug laws, interstate jurisdictional issues, and multi-agency investigations, individuals face a significant disadvantage in negotiations or at trial. Defense counsel with deep experience can negotiate effectively, challenge unlawful procedures, and advocate for alternatives to incarceration when appropriate.
Local experience also matters. Montgomery County’s courts, judges, and prosecutors each have distinct practices and expectations. A defense attorney familiar with these dynamics can leverage local knowledge to better navigate the system and advocate more persuasively on behalf of their clients.
Defense attorney Andrea Kolski has earned a reputation among the elite legal talents in Montgomery County. With more a quarter century of dedicated criminal defense experience in Texas drug courts, Andrea has built a reputation for tenacity and skill in representing clients facing a wide range of drug charges, including those involving interstate transport. Her years as a former Harris County prosecutor and past president of the Montgomery County Criminal Defense Lawyers Association provide Andrea with a unique perspective of the inner workings of the State courts and a wide network of fellow legal experts to call upon.
Andrea’s 5-star reviews praise her ability, tenacity, and reputation as “a pit bull” in the courtroom. This reputation stems is earned through Andrea’s commitment to preparation, her strategic advocacy, and her relentless defense of her clients’ rights.
Whether negotiating with opposing counsel or presenting arguments in court, Andrea’s insight and credibility translate to real advantages in complex cases.
If you or a loved one is facing drug possession across state lines charges in Montgomery County, time is not on your side. Getting ahead of these cases early can make a massive difference in the outcome.
Andrea Kolski and her team at NonstopJustice approach every case with urgency, clarity, and unwavering commitment. Their goal is simple: DISMISSAL. Andrea and her team have won countless dismissals or earned lesser charges that helped clients facing the harshest penalties.
When the stakes are this high, there is no substitute for experience. Choosing an attorney with a record of successful advocacy, deep legal knowledge, and local insight can make all the difference in how your case is resolved.
For more information or to schedule a consultation about your case, contact the office of Andrea Kolski today.